Neo-Obscurantism Unmasked

Pseudo-liberalism

Pseudo-liberalism is the political manifestation of Neo-Obscurantism. It is a totalitarian and elitarian ideology which directly derives from fascism and aims at its same goals (complete top-down control of society by an elite), but uses liberal values, terminology and aesthetics as a disguise (in nearly the same way marxism-leninism used the socialist/communist ones for the same purpose).


Features

How to recognize pseudo-liberalism: the main features that set it apart from actual liberalism.

LIBERALISM

Definition: Ideology striving for the achievement of the highest possible level of freedom and human rights for the highest possible number of people.

PSEUDO-LIBERALISM

Definition: Ideology aiming at the concentration of wealth and power into the hands of an unaccountable elite through totalitarian control of society, hiding behind principles of liberalism as a justification.

Egalitarian

Aims to end racism, sexism, and any other form of discrimination and prejudice.

Discriminatory

Aims to replace the traditional forms of racism and sexism with inverted ones; openly promotes discrimination and marginalization of dissenters.

Impartial

Unconcerned with race, gender, sexuality, etc.; teaches people to look beyond them.

Partial

Obsessed over race, gender, sexuality, etc.; teaches people to base their entire worldview around them.

Tolerant

Sees freedom of speech and expression a prime motor of scientific and social progress, and defends them regardless.

Intolerant

Sees freedom of speech and expression as a threat to social order and advocates for censorship.

Pragmatic

Concerned with actual problems and their material causes.

Trivial

Concerned with meaningless esterior and/or symbolic issues while disregarding the crucial ones.

Straight priorities

Fights where the struggle is most needed, prioritizing the most disadvantaged areas of the world.

Inverted priorities

Keeps fighting old battles while disregarding the most disadvantaged areas of the world.

Open-minded

Recognizes the right of individuals to live their lives as they please; promotes every form of artistic/literary expression.

Bigoted

Prone to syndacate about how people should live their lives, and what forms of expression should be deemed "acceptable" or "problematic".

Pro-people

Always sides with the people and against the elites.

Pro-elite

Most often than not sides with the elites and against the people.

Empowering

Educates people to be conscious about their rights and to demand their respect.

Disempowering

Treats rights as "privileges"; teaches people to feel guilty for being "entitled" and to accept sacrifices.

Progressive

Tries to achieve equality by improving the conditions of those who are at the bottom of society.
Defends the poor and the weak.

Regressive

Tries to achieve equality by worsening the conditions of those who are slightly above the bottom (but leaving untouched those who lie at the very top).
Defends poverty and weakness.

Rational

Bases its views on reason and logic.

Irrational

Bases its views on cheap emotionalism and blind faith in the media.

Critical

Constantly encourages people to question authority and social conventions.

Acritical

Hostile towards anyone who questions authority or social conventions.

Laic

Keeps science and politics strictly separated; engages in scientific debate only with facts and logic, leaving ideological issues at the door.

Ideological

Rejects scientific evidence on the basis of ideological issues; tries to twist science for its own political purposes.

Minarchist

Sees the State as a necessary evil and tries to keep its power in check.

Statalist

Sees the State as the solution to all problems, and keeps giving it more power.

Goal-oriented

Sees change as a means for an end (i.e.: the improvement of society) and embraces it only as long as it guarantees actual progress.

Change-oriented

Sees change as an end in itself, and embraces it regardless of whether it leads to any actual progress or not.

Return